An Spanish American War History Essay

An Spanish American War History Essay This paper discusses about the war between Spain and United States and the summaries the causes of Spanish and American war. It also details the significant events during the Spanish-American war. This paper describes the important terms, people and events of Spanish -American war. It examines the Spanish-Cuban Tensions and the Yellow Journalism of Spanish -American war. This paper also provides the American Imperialism and Treaty of Paris. It states the effects of the Treaty of Paris during the Spanish-American war. This paper concludes this concept by providing the essential concept of Spanish-American war. Spanish- American War Summary of Spanish- American war The Spanish-American war was a conflict between America and Spain in 1898 effectively due to the intervention of US in the ongoing Cuban War of Independence. United States was attacked Pacific possessions of Spain led to the involvement in the case of Philippine Revolution as well as to Philippine- American war. The public opinion of America was grown at reports of Spanish Atrocities in Cuba. United States tariff had put restrictions on sugar imports to America and severely hurt the economy of Cuba that was dependent on the producing and selling sugar. The main issue was that Cuban independence, the ten-week war was fought in the case of both Caribbean and Pacific. United States had many business men with the investment interests in the case of Cuba that became concerned. The public of United States was stirred into anti- Spain frenzy due to the Yellow journalism of men including Hearst and Pulitzer. In 1898, America was dispatched the USS Maine on a friendly mission to Cuba. American fought the war in the case of fronts such as Cuba after the declaration. In 1898, the Treaty of Paris was signed in order to ending the Spanish- American war. After the Spanish-American war, America was improved Cuba in the case of infrastructure and educational systems and United States had also decided to move from their places. In 1901, America was forced Cuba for inserting the Platt Amendment in the case of their constitution that have given the US military base. America was also kept the Island countries for ships in Cuba. This is the summary of Spanish-American war. Increasing Spanish-Cuban Tensions (19th century) Cuba had been a colony of Spain and this Spain was dependent upon sugar production. In 19th century, many people in Cuba were dissatisfied with the ruling Spanish regime. The government of Spanish was also riddled with the inefficient, corruption and unwilling for granting Cuban populations. As a result, nationalist of Cuban people wanted for ending Spanish rule for the protection of Cuban. After the war, Spanish promised reforms and but the nationalists assumed this too late. The Spanish would leave for US intervention and because of American had significant economic investment in Cuba. In 1896, the Spanish was sent the general to Cuba in order to putting down the insurrection and the general was built the camps in order to prevent the insurrectos from leading population against Spanish rule. In Cuba, the segments of US public were outraged by the reports of atrocities. In 1895, Cuban revolt included a general opposition to a long history of Spanish control. The tariff raised prices in the sugar products that were imported from Cuba in the case of protecting US sugar growers. American Imperialism (1898) The imperialist behaviour of United States was occurred in 1898 that has been a great historical attention. America had commonly claimed for standing in opposition for the practising of taking of colonies to be democracy for all. During this war, the German and British were the famous countries and those countries were not involved in Spanish- American war. This war was required the help of these two countries in the event of serious fighting. United Kingdom required for offsetting German intimidation in order to foster better relation between Britain and America. The ground troops of America were arrived in the Philippines and the US troops allied with the Filipino for fighting against Spain. This Spanish and American war proved the importance of Pacific Islands among to these countries. The Pacific cross road was used for supplying the US Navy in future operations in Pacific Islands. In 1898, Hawaii could be easily performed as a coaling station without formal annexation and because American businessmen had also controlled the Island anyway. The imperialism of American was anti-colonialism of the early republic and but conscious options dependent upon the economic motivations and that held true before 1898. This was the imperialism of United States. Treaty of Paris (1898) The Treaty of Paris was the agreement that was signed on 1898 at the end of Spanish- American war. The Treaty of Paris also indicated the concluded stage of Spanish Empire and the Pacific Ocean. The Treaty of Paris granted to United States the rights of Ownership to Guam and Puerto Rico. After the agreement, Cuba region was given to Cuban in the case of Treaty of Paris of 1989 and the Spain was considered the tremendous financial debt Cuba owed towards United States. America agreed in order to paying twenty million dollars for the Philippines according to their agreement. The Treaty of Paris was also eliminated the presence of Spanish Empire with the America and in the case of Islands of the Pacific region. The Treaty of Paris was also made several privileges to Cuba and the Cuban people were satisfied with this agreement. After the agreement, America decided to replace from Cubans place and they constructed many elements for the enhancement of Cuban people. Conclusion The

Children, Media, and Violence Essay -- Media Violence and Aggression

"The evidence is overwhelming. To argue against it, the link between media violence and teen violence is like arguing against gravity," said Jeffrey McIntyre, legislative and federal affairs officer for the American Psychological Association. As children are exposed to acts of violence in the media through television, video games, music, movies, etc. alarming results are occurring. The main negative effect being an increase in aggression among youth who are regularly exposed to the media and an increase in violent patterns as they mature into adulthood. If not resolved this problem of violence in the media will continue to push children, youth and adults to acts of aggression such as verbal and physical abuse and other more serious crimes. On average an American child will see 16,000 murders and 200,000 acts of violence by the age of 18 through the television. Thousands of studies from the 1950s to the present day have all suggested that viewing violent acts will increase violent behavior while only less than 20 have suggested otherwise (Boyse). As our children are exposed to these 16,000 murders and 200,000 violent acts one can only conclude that aggression, crime and violence can only increase in our younger generations from being exposed to the current media. One study, done by a panel of experts, showed that when youth are exposed short term to violent movies, television and video games that there is an increase in aggressive thinking and behavior. Their studies also show a long term effect into adulthood when individuals are continually exposed to violent media growing up, with spouse abuse and other aggressive acts (Huesmann). I personally remember growing up playing violent video games such as Halo and hearing, ... ...Mathis Grayson, Charlotte. â€Å"Media Violence May Affect Children's Minds.† WebMD. June 2005. Web. March 2012 Palo Alto Medical Foundation. 2012. Sutter Health. 3 March 2012 Park, Alice. â€Å"How Playing Violent Video Games May Change the Brain.† Healthland: Time Mag., 2 Dec. 2011. Web. March 2012. Wang, Yang. â€Å"Violent Video Games Alter Brain Function in Young Men.† Medical School News 1 Dec. 2011. Indiana U. Web. March 2012.

Science and Religion

Science and Religion (SRP 420) Science and Religion–two disciplines that at first glance seem to be completely separate modes of thought. After more careful examination one comes to realize that they bump into each other often. Indeed, science and religion seem to have a complex history involving both conflict and resolution. Many theologians, philosophers, and scientists have developed theories on how science and religion can coexist. One such man is John Polkinghorne a scientist and philosopher; he has developed his own theory on the relationship between science and religion.In the first chapter of his book Quarks, Chaos, and Christianity Polkinghorne lays out his theory for the coexistence of science and religion. He begins by discussing the impressiveness of science and its many accomplishments. Next he goes on to discuss the truth of religion and challenges the claim that religion is simply a personal truth or an opinion, while science is fact. He quickly claims this stat ement is false, because making this conclusion would be a, â€Å"fundamental mistake of the most disastrous kind† (Polkinghorne, 2).This faulty conclusion about the integration of science and religion, according to Polkinghorne, has is often made because of two mistakes: about the basis of scientific knowledge and the other about religious belief. The general mistake that has been made about science is that it is a simple process in which a prediction is formulated, an experiment is performed, and presto a new discovery is made. In actuality there is much more involved in the art of scientific discovery. For instance, scientists often do not have pure facts, but rather they are dealing with knowledge that they must interpret for themselves.To interpret knowledge, according to Polkinghorne, is often quite difficult and requires one to formulate a point of view or an opinion in order to reach a conclusion. Choosing a point of view or having an opinion requires people to be bold and brave because they are betting things happen in a certain way. Therefore in science fact and opinion are constantly mixed up with one another. The major mistake people make in religion is that is that it involves a kind of â€Å"leap into the dark† (Polkinghorne, 10). While religion does involve faith and faith does sometimes require a leap, it is in no way a leap into the dark.Polkinghorne criticizes this theory by asking a variety of questions such as: what would be the purpose of religion if this were true? Why would anyone be religious if it involved such blind trust? (Polkinghorne, 2) Therefore, he concludes religion must be a leap of faith, but it is a leap into the light. The main point Polkinghorne is making here is that religion can only be of real value if it is actually true, otherwise he claims religion would simply only be a, â€Å"technique for whistling in the dark to keep our spirits up† (Polkinghorne, 14).The conclusion reached at the end of the a rgument is that science and religion are â€Å"intellectual cousins,† (Polkinghorne, 11) in that they are both searching for truth, but neither can say that they have achieved it and each must base its conclusions on an interaction between interpretation, experience, and opinion. They both also must always be open to corrections if mistakes are found, because they are part of a kind of wonderful human journey to understand and be in sync with the physical and spiritual world around us.Nevertheless, there are major differences between science and religion that cannot be overlooked, and Polikinghorne points out these differences. Essentially science is dealing with a physical world that we are able to poke and prod even if we cannot always see exactly what is happening. However, religion cannot be put to an experimental test in the same way that science can. Although science and religion are different in this way they are still both attempts to understand even if they go about in different ways. Overall, I think Polkinghorne offered a solid argument for the coexistence of science and religion.As a science major I really appreciate the fact that Polkinghorne is an inhabitant of both the scientific and religious community. Like Polkinghorne I agree with the argument that neither science nor religion can offer an ultimate understanding of the world around us, but if they work together in harmony it is possible that they will eventually be able to achieve a greater understanding. In considering science and religion one must understand that neither can tell you everything and believing that one form of knowing can tell you everything forces a person to take a very diminished view of life.In conclusion, Polkinghorne offers a simple and straightforward argument for how science and religion can exist together without contradiction. While the argument if fairly simple it is also effective and the main point is that science and religion are just different attempts to answer the same questions. Neither can answer these questions on their own to achieve greater understanding of the physical and spiritual world around us, both science and religion must be considered. Works Cited Polikinghorne, John. Quarks, Chaos, & Christianity. NY: Crossroads, 1994.

History Of Polynesian Tattoos - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 5 Words: 1544 Downloads: 2 Date added: 2019/05/06 Category Culture Essay Level High school Tags: Tattoo Essay Did you like this example? Polynesian tattoos, commonly known as to us as tribal tattoos play a big role in culture of any Pacific Islander. These sacred markings have a lot of meaning, and may even be seen as offensive if worn by a person that is not of the previously stated land. They can mean a number of things based on location of the body or whether the person is a man or woman. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "History Of Polynesian Tattoos" essay for you Create order Even the slightest discrepancy in shape could change the meaning of the tattoo. In this essay, we will discuss the many elements of Polynesian tattoos, where they came from, and why they mean so much to the people of the Pacific. In 1778, Captain James Cook sailed to Hawaii, specifically the island of Kauai. Upon arrival, Captain Cook was very surprised by the deep respect that the Hawaiians had for their ancestors. However, while on the island, Cook came across a number of people, and these people mistook him for Lono, a Hawaiian God who is associated with fertility, agriculture, rainfall, music and peace, because his ships masts and sails looked like an insignia of the God. Cook was treated well and with respect while he was on the island because of the mistaken identity. After his visit, he went to the Americas and brought tattooing there. That is where the word tattoo comes from. Mainland people couldnt pronounce tatau, so they just said tattoo. Nonetheless, things turned around rather quickly when James Cook returned to the Hawaiian Islands for a repair on his ship. The people realized this is not Lono, so they killed Captain Cook right there on the shore. Peace in Hawaii didnt last long either, because after that, settlers came and began to colonize the islands, and on May 8, 1819, King Kamehameha I, one one Hawaii greatest rulers, passed away. This led the Kapu System † a set of taboos that regulated behaviors † to slowly disappear. As the colonizers took over the islands, the began to infiltrate other places. Samoa, Tonga, Fiji, and even New Zealand. The Kapu System, traditional dances, celebratory garments, and so many other sacred cultural things, including tatau (tattoos), disappeared. Inking of the body began within Polynesia specifically for war. Polynesians thought that the tattoos looked scary! Tattoos for war were placed on the head and neck to symbolize knowledge and wisdom, the chest to symbolize honor, the lower torso for courage and independence, and the upper arms to symbolize strength and bravery. These were classic tattoos for men because in those days, they were typically called for war. Men that did not fight in wars were only to be tattooed on the right side of the body. Women would typically get tattooed on the left side of their body on the lower arms and hands for craft or creation, and on the lower torso for procreation and sexuality. During ceremonial occasions, women would be tattooed on the hands. This was called lima, and it was required to be able to drink kava, which is a drink made from the root of a kava plant that is served in big celebrations and also in many royal settings. Each different shape and design means something different, and there are many different designs that have so many meanings. This plays a big role in why Polynesians frown upon those who get tatau and are not of Pacific Islander descent. So, going on with how shapes and designs have varied meanings, this means that a warrior or chief could not have the same tattoos as a woman or civilian man. This also applies to people of higher power, such as Kings and Queens. They could have similar or the same tattoos because they are of the same ranking, but a man couldnt have the same tattoos as a woman because men are believed to be more powerful and held higher than a woman. This quickly changed when Queen Liliuoikalani came into power, but ta lking about that would consist of another essay. Tattoos were traditionally applied to the body in very a unique way. Polynesian people used the stick and poke method. This method is still used to this day. Though it isnt sanitary, Polynesians try to connect with our roots a much as possible. But back then, tattoo artists or, tufuga, would pass their skills from father to son. The young trainee would learn by watching and then doing. He would serve a very long time, even years tapping his comb, or au, into bark cloth until his trainer (father) would approve of his work. After the time of war, people would still get stick and poke tattoos in honor of their ancestors that fought for them. They would sit through hours of extreme pain to get the tattoos because the marks left would celebrate cultural traditions. It was also common for people to get tattooed to honor those who laid their lives for the people of the islands. Todays tattoos are done in a very sanitary way; clean shops, regular inspections, and sanitization all go into mak ing sure your tattoo doesnt get infected and heals right. However, tatau risked infection and even death by infection. This is why now, many of us Polynesians do not partake in the traditional stick-and-poke tattoos, we prefer to honor our ancestors in a way that is healthy and safe for us all. Not only was the risk for infection and death by infection extreme, but the pain was as well. Polynesians would sit through long hours of intensive pain to get these imprints left on their body, and by the words of my grandmother, the matriarch of our Hawaiian family, we still bear the hurt of tattoos because the pain you feel from your tatau will never match the pain of our ancestors, who gave the ultimate sacrifice for our Kanaka Maoli (Native Hawaiians). That is why we still sit through the pain. To honor those who fought for us. And I can tell you, this is the mindset of a large portion of not only Hawaiinas, but Polynesians as a whole. On the flip side of tattooing, those who refused to be tattooed were looked at very negatively. They were label ed as a palaai, meaning coward. Sometimes, people just couldnt endure the pain, so they walked through life feeling like a shame. Jumping more into todays day and age, tattoos are very common. People all over the world get anything they want put onto their bodies. But we are talking specifically about tattoos from the Pacific Islands. So more modernly, we Polynesians get traditional tribal tattoos, like our ancestors did, to honor them. We use a variation of shapes and designs, as said before, but nowadays we dont get the same tattoos as the warriors and chiefs used to. We get things like shells to represent fertility and peace, shark teeth to honor our ancestors courage and power, a spearhead to represent our own power, and the sun and its rays to symbolize grandness and riches. We also use things like tiki faces, or ikaika, to drive out bad energies. When it comes to tying traditions from two thousand years ago to now, we all still thing of our tattoos as a link between heaven or rangi, and earth or papa, because as you can tell, Polynesian tattoos are mainly based on nature. The placement is important too. A s stated before, women get tattooed on the left and men on the right, which is still true to this day. Before, men used to get tattoos all over if they were warriors, but now, we just stick to the usual sides out of respect to those that have made the ultimate sacrifice for us. Now touching on something I said before, Polynesians get offended by tribal tattoos. You might be thinking Im contradicting myself because this whole essay is about how people of the Pacific Islands honor tattoos so much. Well, its tricky to explain this, but basically if you are not of Polynesian descent, you are frowned upon for getting tattooed in our tribal. Why is this you may ask? Well, it is appropriating our culture. Islanders see our tattoos as something sacred because of the history behind it, so when we see somebody just putting it onto their body for no rhyme or reason, it is quite offensive. Even people like myself, a light-skinned woman who is literally directly related, by blood, to Queen Liliuokalani, would be frowned upon for getting tatau, until someone actually found out that Im of Polynesian descent. Taking everything into consideration, there is a lot of history that goes into learning about the Polynesian tatau. From Capt. James Cook visiting our islands and then bringing tattoos into the Americas, to how we honor our ancestors with tattoos today, holds a special place in the heart of any Polynesian. It resembles our deep, strong reverence for those who sacrificed for us. Not only that, it inspires us to keep traditions alive and to be strong like the people before our time. Polynesian tattoos are sacred, beautiful, and hold so much meaning. They are unique and have history. We will never forget how the islands used to be, because tatau will forever be imprinted on our bodies to remind us.